EUROPEAN countries could BOYCOTT the World Cup if Gianni Infantino’s plan to flog a chunk of Fifa goes ahead.
It emerged on Tuesday that Fifa are plotting to launch, and sell stakes in, a sister company that will preside over the World Cup and Club World Cup.
Selling off up to 20 per cent in a new Fifa Forward Enterprise could raise world football’s governing body more than £3billion from private investors, with plans having already received staunch opposition from UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
Infantino, 56, would stand to make substantial sums in bonuses should the plan be successful – while he could also then move into a “commissioner” role worth tens of millions with the new subsidiary once his final Fifa term comes to a mandatory end in 2031.
Uefa have already penned a furious response to the plans, with a statement reading: “This crosses a line that football’s governing institutions should never cross. Uefa takes it extremely seriously.
“So should every National Football Association. So should every stakeholder: leagues, clubs, players, supporters, governments and everyone who cares about the future of the game.
“The soul and governance of football are not assets to trade – especially with zero transparency as to who gains financially. None of us are the owners of football. It is not Fifa’s to sell.”
According to Sky News, Uefa nations are set to discuss a World Cup boycott in opposition to Fifa’s plans.
Concacaf, which oversees international football in Central and North America, echoed the FA’s sentiments in another statement.
“Concacaf was only made aware of this matter through media reports and, subsequently, via a media release. We are deeply concerned by the lack of due process.
“We share the disappointment of many within our region and the game that this level of detail has been designed and shared publicly before any discussion with the relevant governance bodies and stakeholders has taken place.
“As leaders within football, we are the custodians of the game. Collectively, Fifa, the confederations and every member association have a responsibility to always act in the best interests of the sport.
“Every decision we make must be guided by good governance, robust processes and long-term stewardship. This is the framework within which Concacaf operates. We trust that all within the Fifa family will act in the same manner.”
Member associations will meet virtually for an emergency summit this week, with a possible boycott on the agenda.
The FA have released a statement questioning the plans and their lack of transparency, and relaying their “deep concern” in regard to the project.
They wrote: “We were completely unaware of this proposal and no substantive details, including what the proposition actually is, and what conditions are attached.
“Based on the limited information, we are deeply concerned about the lack of process and governance to get to this point, and the apparent substance and principles involved.
“When the proposal is shared in the full and transparent way now promised by Fifa, we will make our views clear, and comment further.”
Various football associations met with Fifa on the eve of the World Cup final earlier this month, but these plans were not discussed.
Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin has already been critical of Infantino’s Fifa in recent weeks.
He expressed his fury at Folarin Balogun‘s red card suspension being lifted during the World Cup, following a conversation between the Fifa president and Donald Trump.
Ceferin had attended the tournament’s opener, notably in Mexico, but opted to snub the final.
There is also a Trump connection with regards to the Fifa Forward Enterprise project.
Thrive Capital is understood to be the leading bidder, with its CEO Joshua Kushner the younger brother of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Infantino has responded to criticism, insisting that the plans will allow Fifa to offer more funding to member associations.
The under-fire president said: “Our next stage of growth needs a structure built for it, one where the commercial side of the game operates as a focused, dedicated business, with its value shared more and better all around the world.
“Every Fifa Member Association should have an opportunity to seek a fair share of the available funding to shape its own future, deciding for itself rather than relying on others. This is about the democratisation of football worldwide.”
Opposing the plans, UK PM Burnham wrote on X: “Let me say this very directly.
“Football does not belong to investors. It belongs to the people who fill the stands and who stand on the touchline week in, week out, rain or shine.
“The World Cup is not a product. It is the greatest competition in world sport, and it was never anyone’s to sell. Dress the deal up however you like. Once you have sold a piece of it, you have sold out.
“Football belongs to the fans. It always has, and it always will.”
Ex-Liverpool player Stan Collymore suggested Uefa should split from Fifa, adding: “Uefa’s power base is 10, 20, 1,000 times more.
“It’s where all the players, storied clubs, monster crowds, greatest coaches, referees and sheer size of football infrastructure is.”
Gary Lineker reposted the BBC’s Instagram story with the comment “Nothing surprises me any more” and a vomit emoji.
It’s claimed that member associations will have access to $20m (£15m) in funding between 2027 and 2030 – an increase from the current $8m (£6m).
Next year there is a Women’s World Cup scheduled to take place in Brazil.
Then there is a Club World Cup scheduled for 2029, although a host nation has not yet been decided.
The next men’s World Cup will go ahead across Spain, Portugal and Morocco – plus Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay for one match each – in four years.
Even if Uefa nations all oppose Fifa’s plans, Infantino and Co only need to receive a majority vote from their 211 member associations worldwide in order to press ahead with their project.
But a full Uefa boycott would cause significant issues for Fifa, given European football’s strength and support.
The 2022-2026 World Cup cycle is said to have pocketed Fifa £11.3BN in its current format.
In a further bid to increase revenue even more, it is expected that the World Cup will eventually expand again, this time to 64 teams.
There are also fears the new proposal could see pressure to stage the tournament more than once every four years.






